Governance

ACF Technical Working Group

The community-governed body that owns, maintains, and evolves the ACF standard. Open to qualified participants across five seat categories.

What the Working Group does

The ACF Technical Working Group (TWG) is the governing body responsible for maintaining ACF v1.0 and developing future versions of the standard. The TWG owns the test methodology, pass/fail criteria, module specifications, and auditor accreditation requirements.

All amendments to the standard require TWG approval via a 2/3 supermajority vote following a mandatory 45-day public comment period. This ensures the standard evolves through legitimate consensus rather than unilateral decisions by any single party — including ACF itself.

The working group charter is the authoritative document governing TWG operations. It defines seat categories, voting rights, amendment procedures, conflict-of-interest rules, and the standards development lifecycle.

Current Status

ACF v1.0In effect as of January 1, 2026
Working group charterPublished
Public comment portalOpen
Next revision cycleQ3 2026

Seat Availability

Enterprise Operators2 open seats
Infrastructure Providers1 open seat
Independent Researchers1 open seat
Civil Society ObserversOpen enrollment

Five Seat Categories

Enterprise Operators

Organizations deploying certified agents in production. Full voting rights. Maximum 3 seats to prevent operator capture of the standard.

Infrastructure Providers

AI model providers, cloud platforms, and tooling vendors. Advisory voting on technical specifications. Maximum 2 seats.

Independent Researchers

Academic and independent AI safety researchers. Full voting rights. Prohibited from commercial relationships with current operators under review.

Regulatory / Legal Representatives

Regulatory affairs specialists and legal practitioners with AI governance expertise. Advisory role on compliance module alignment.

Civil Society Observers

Non-voting observers from consumer protection, digital rights, and public interest organizations. Comment rights on all proposals.

How the Standard Evolves — 7-Phase Amendment Process

  1. 1

    Phase 1Proposal

    Member submits a written proposal including the specific change, rationale, affected test IDs or sections, and proposed pass/fail criteria where applicable.

  2. 2

    Phase 2Working Group Review

    TWG reviews the proposal for scope, clarity, and feasibility. Proposal is accepted for comment period or returned for revision within 14 days.

  3. 3

    Phase 3Public Comment (45 days)

    Accepted proposals are published for 45-day public comment. Any organization or individual may submit written comments.

  4. 4

    Phase 4Revision

    TWG revises the proposal based on substantive public comments. All comments receive a written disposition (accepted / rejected / noted).

  5. 5

    Phase 5Vote

    TWG votes. Adoption requires a 2/3 supermajority of voting members. Emergency amendments (security-critical only) may use a 7-day vote with unanimous consent.

  6. 6

    Phase 6Publication

    Adopted amendments published with an effective date no less than 90 days from publication.

  7. 7

    Phase 7Transition

    90-day transition period during which the prior version remains valid for in-flight certifications.

How to Get Involved

Apply for a seat

Submit a brief application describing your organization, relevant expertise, and the seat category you are applying for. The TWG reviews applications quarterly. Contact registry@acfstandards.org with subject line "TWG Application."

Provide input

You do not need to be a working group member to provide input. The public input portal on the standards page is open at all times. All submissions are logged and reviewed by the working group quarterly.

Attend as an observer

Working group meetings are open to registered observers. Meeting schedules and summaries are published after each session. Contact us to register as an observer.